🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.