🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to employ the districts created after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision comes amid a national contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican majority. Usually, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading Democratic figure argued the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by upholding a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.